Xperia Camera Great Quality

[Pinguino1]

These pictures are great despite the camera is only 3.15 mp
Pictures taken during the Tent London Event.

To start slide show, click below the picture on the right side

http://www.wallpaper.com/newgallery/17050547/1

[Bubble]

WOOOOOHOOOO!!!! Man am I happy with that quality. Now there's just 1 thing missing from the XPERIA, AN ACCELEROMETER. I don't want an accelerometer so the X1 will change orientation automaticly, I just want to play some motion sensing games and get apps like a pedometer and other stuff that needs a ACCELEROMETER. I just don't understand why S.E didn't add it. Our only hope now is that they added the accelerometer but didn't write in the specs like Nokia did with the N95.

[norseman]

there seemed to be a bt of blurring in some photos where movement was present or poor light, hopefully it is still a preproduction model and the production one will be slightly better, but overall nice piccies

[Carlin]

I don't see any focus att all on picture 6 and it seems like they used digital zoom on picture 12. I think that it's the bright light that makes pictures 13 and 14 look that bad. No focus at pic 15 either... Love the colours in pic 21 though :-D
That's just me, but I don't need a great camera on my phone. I got a better one that IS a camera ;-)

[bloob]

I agree with the comments so far. The pictures in bright light look very sharp and good colour balance. While those in low light or zoomed have much more noise and shake blurring. Of course the LED photolight is only enough to illuminate but useless in dark situations.

All things considered, already decent photo capabilities for a 3.2mp phone camera. If you need better pictures, use a real camera.

[Walter E Kurts]

Here's my question. Why does my camera from 2002 with 2.1 megapixels look better than that? What's the reason that camera phones all are just not THAT great?? This is a good camera (great actually), for a cell phone, but why does it just not NEARLY live up to what actual cameras can do?

[MLucas]

Originally Posted by Bubble

WOOOOOHOOOO!!!! Man am I happy with that quality. Now there's just 1 thing missing from the XPERIA, AN ACCELEROMETER. I don't want an accelerometer so the X1 will change orientation automaticly, I just want to play some motion sensing games and get apps like a pedometer and other stuff that needs a ACCELEROMETER. I just don't understand why S.E didn't add it. Our only hope now is that they added the accelerometer but didn't write in the specs like Nokia did with the N95.

I hate to bring this to you but:

"... Sony Ericsson confirmed that the Xperia X1 will definitely not have an accelerometer ..."

Here you can read the complete article...


These photo's look great! They look better than the pictures from my old Nokia N73 (with 3.15MP too)...

[Carlin]

Originally Posted by Walter E Kurts

Here's my question. Why does my camera from 2002 with 2.1 megapixels look better than that? What's the reason that camera phones all are just not THAT great?? This is a good camera (great actually), for a cell phone, but why does it just not NEARLY live up to what actual cameras can do?

Simply because megapixels are irrelevant when it comes to photo quality =)
It's relevant when it comes to size though.

[bloob]

Phone cameras are greatly compromised by their inferior optics, small CCD, image processing software and without dedicated digital image processors that you normally find in proper digital cameras.

Nonetheless, SE, Nokia and Samsung have all come a long way in making things work pretty decently in their phone cameras so far.

[Walter E Kurts]

Yeah... Just seems weird to me that we haven't come to a point where they have a camera/phone.

Not a phone/camera...